I spend a lot of time with ideas on the burner and things in the pipeline. This is one that I wish I could take credit for. This is Why You’re Fat is incredible — I’m so jealous. All in all, the site is pretty self explanatory, but in its simplicity it offers a disgusting gustatory tour of debilitatingly appetizing food. I feel obese just looking at it. Yum.
[The picture above is tagged on their site as "Krispy Kreme Bacon Cheddar Cheeseburgers," though I'm told that it is colloquially known as the "Luther Burger"]
What an awesome collective. I’m on the job hunt right now and Civil Twilight is exactly the kind of thing I would love to be involved with. This is an example of smart, conscious design at it’s best.
“Objectum sexuals” are people who find themselves in sexual and/or romantic relationships with inanimate objects — read: being in love with the Golden Gate Bridge, being in love with fences, etc. I find it an interesting development/divergence in light of the current fetishization of industrial design. While the items identified as “lovers” tend to lean more towards architecture, they still fall in the realm of designed objects.
The full documentary can be found in two parts: 1 / 2
Projects like this are great examples of why art appeals so much to me. In basic terms this is a very simple idea, but the photo documentation of the whole thing yields such complex, intimate reactions. I think these photos are incredible.
Polar Inertia: “an outlet and a resource for on going research into the networks and patterns that define the contemporary city. The journal began with the idea that the understanding of a culture requires immersion into the instruments of media, technology and infrastructure that have molded its growth.” This bi-monthly publication provides an incredibly fascinating look at the minutae of cities, societies, and culture. Polar Inertia is without a doubt one of my favorite finds in the last year or so. There’s no RSS feed, but make sure to add yourself to the mailing list.
“‘The so-called ‘melting pot’ has happily failed, Bourne wrote, and he called the “English-American conservatism” which would demand it the ‘chief obstacle to social advance.’ Without the cultural variety brought by immigrants, [...] America was doomed to stagnation.”
“‘What we emphatically do not want is that these distinctive qualities [of immigrants] should be washed out into a tasteless, colorless fluid of uniformity. Already we have far too much of this insipidity. . . .The failure of the melting-pot, far from closing the great American democratic experiment, means that it has only just begun. Whatever American nationalism turns out to be, we see already that it will have a color richer and more exciting than our ideal has hitherto encompassed. In a world which has dreamed of internationalism, we find that we have all unawares been building up the first international nation. ”
